Web
and Book design,
Copyright, Kellscraft Studio 1999-2016 (Return to Web Text-ures) |
(HOME)
|
CHAPTER X IT was
this new growth of humanity which made continuing social progress so
rapid and
so sure. These young minds had no rubbish in them. They had a vivid
sense of
the world as a whole, quite beyond their family "relations." They
were marvelously reasonable, free from prejudice, able to see and
willing to
do. And this spreading tide of hope and courage flowed back into the
older
minds, as well as forward into the new. I found
that people's ideas of youth and age had altered materially. Nellie
said it was
due to the change in women — but then she laid most things to that. She
reminded me that women used to be considered only as females, and were
"old" when no longer available in that capacity; but that as soon as
they recognized themselves as human beings they put "Grandma" into
the background, and "Mother" too; and simply went on working and
growing and enjoying life up into the lively eighties — even nineties,
sometimes. "Brains
do not cease to function at fifty," she said. "Just because a woman
is no longer an object to 'fall in love' with, it does not follow that
life has
no charms for her. Women to-day have all that they ever had before, all
that was
good in it; and more, a thousand times more. When the lives of half the
world
widen like that it widens the other half too." This quite
evidently had happened. The
average mental standard was higher, the outlook broader. I found many
very
ordinary people, of course; some whose only attitude toward this
wonderful new
world was to enjoy its advantages; and even some who grumbled. These
were
either old persons with bad digestions or new immigrants from very
backward
countries. I traveled
about, visiting different places, consulting all manner of authorities,
making
notes, registering objections. It was all interesting, and grew more so
as it
seemed less strange. My sense of theatrical unreality gave way to a
growing
appreciation of the universal beauty about me. Art, I
found, held a very different position from what it used to hold. It had
joined
hands with life again, was common, familiar, used in all things. There
were
pictures, many and beautiful, but the great word Art was no longer so
closely
confined to its pictorial form. It was not narrow, expensive, requiring
a
special education, but part of the atmosphere in which all children
grew, all
people lived. For
instance the theatre, which I remember as a two-dollar affair, and
mainly
vulgar and narrow, was now the daily companion and teacher. The
historic
instinct with which nearly every child is born was cultivated without
check.
The little ones played through all their first years of instruction,
played the
old stone age (most natural to them!) the new stone age, the first
stages of
industry. Older children learned history that way; and as they reached
years of
appreciation, special dramas were written for them, in which psychology
and
sociology were learned without hearing their names. Those
happy, busy, eager young things played gaily through wide ranges of
human
experience; and when these emotions touched them in later years, they
were not
strange and awful, but easy to understand. In every
smallest village there was a playhouse, not only in the child-gardens,
but for
the older people. They each had their dramatic company, as some used to
have
their bands; had their musical companies too, and better ones. Out of
this universal use of the drama rose freely those of special talent who
made it
the major business of their lives; and the higher average everywhere
gave to
these greater ones the atmosphere of real appreciation which a growing
art must
have. I asked
Nellie how the people managed who lived in the real country — remote
and alone. "We
don't live that way any more," she said. "Only some stubborn old
people, like Uncle Jake and Aunt Dorcas. You see the women decided that
they
must live in groups to have proper industrial and educational
advantages; and
they do." "Where
do the men live?" I asked grimly. "With
the women, of course — Where should they? I don't mean that a person
cannot go
and live in a hut on a mountain, if he likes; we do that in summer,
very
largely. It is a rest to be alone part of the time. But living, real
human
living, requires a larger group than one family. You can see the
results." I could
and I did; though I would not always admit it to Nellie; and this
beautiful
commonness of good music, good architecture, good sculpture, good
painting,
good drama, good dancing, good literature, impressed me increasingly.
Instead
of those perpendicular peaks of isolated genius we used to have,
surrounded by
the ignorantly indifferent many, and the excessively admiring few,
those
geniuses now sloped gently down to the average on long graduated lines
of
decreasing ability. It gave to the commonest people a possible road of
upward
development, and to the most developed a path of connection with the
commonest
people. The geniuses seemed to like it too. They were not so conceited,
not so
disagreeable, not so lonesome. People
seemed to have a very good time, even while at work; indeed very many
found
their work more fun than anything else. The
abundant leisure gave a sort of margin to life which was wholly new, to
the
majority at least. It was that spare time, and the direct efforts of
the
government in wholesale educational lines, which had accomplished so
much in
the first ten years. Owen
reminded me of the educational vitality even of the years I knew; of
the
university extension movement, the lectures in the public schools, the
push of
the popular magazines; the summer schools, the hundreds of thousands of
club
women, whose main effort seemed to be to improve their minds. "And
the Press," I said — "our splendid Press." "That
was one of our worst obstacles, I'm sorry to say," he answered. I looked
at him. "Oh, go ahead, go ahead! You'll tell me the public schools were
an
obstacle next." "They
would have been — if we hadn't changed them," he agreed. "But they
were in our hands at least, and we got them re-arranged very promptly.
That
absurd old despotism which kept the grade of teachers down so low, was
very
promptly changed. We have about five times as many teachers now, fifty
times as
good and far better paid, not only in cash, but in public appreciation.
Our
teachers are 'leading citizens' now — we have elected one President
from the
School Principalship of a state." This was
news, and not unpleasant. "Have
you elected any Editors?" "No —
but we may soon. They are a new set of men now I can tell you; and
women, of
course. You remember in our day journalism was frankly treated as a
trade;
whereas it is visibly one of the most important professions." "And
did you so reform those Editors, so that they became as
self-sacrificing as
country doctors?" "Oh,
no. But we changed the business conditions. It was the advertising that
corrupted the papers — mostly; and the advertisers were only screaming
for
bread and butter — especially butter. When Socialism reorganized
business there
was no need to scream. "But
I find plenty of advertising in the papers and magazines." "Certainly
— it is a great convenience. Have you studied it?" I had to
own that I had not particularly — I
never did like advertising. "You'll
find it worth reading. In the first place
it's all true." "How
do you secure that?" "We
have made lying to the public a crime — don't you remember? Each
community has
its Board of Standards; there is a constant effort to improve standards
you
see, in all products; and expert judgment may always be had, for
nothing. If
any salesman advertises falsely he loses his job, if he's an official;
and is
posted, if he's selling as a private individual. When the public is
told
officially that Mr. Jones is a liar it hurts his trade." "You
have a Government Press?" "Exactly.
The Press is pre-eminently a public function — it is not and never was
a
private business — not legitimately." "But
you do have private papers and magazines?" "Yes
indeed, lots of them. Ever so many personal 'organs,' large and small.
But they
don't carry advertising. If enough people will buy a man's paper to pay
him,
he's quite free to publish." "How
do you prevent his carrying advertising?" "It's
against the law — like any other misdemeanor. Post Office won't take it
— he
can't distribute. No, if you want to find out about the latest
breakfast food
— (and there are a score you never heard
of) — or the last improvement in
fountain pens or airships — you find it all, clear, short, and
reliable, in the
hotel paper of every town. There's no such bulk of advertising matter
now, you
see; not so many people struggling to sell the same thing." "Is
all business socialized?" "Yes
— and no. All the main business is; the big assured steady things that
our life
depends on. But there is a free margin for individual initiative — and
always
will be. We are not so foolish as to cut off that supply. We have more
inventors and idealists than ever; and plenty of chance for trial. You
see the
two hours a day which pays board, so to speak, leaves plenty of time to
do
other work; and if the new thing the man does is sufficiently valuable
to
enough people, he is free to do that alone. Like the little one-man
papers I
spoke of. If a man can find five thousand people who will pay a dollar
a year to
read what he says he's quite as likely to make his living that way." "Have
you no competition at all?" "Plenty
of it. All our young folks are racing and chasing to break the record;
to do
more work, better work, new work." "But
not under the spur of necessity." "Why,
yes they are. The most compelling necessity we know. They have to do
it; it is
in them and must get out." "But
they are all sure of a living, aren't they?" "Yes,
of course. Oh, I see! What you meant by necessity was hunger and cold.
Bless
you, John, poverty was no spur. It was a deadly anesthetic." I looked
my disagreement, and he went on: "You remember the hideous poverty and
helplessness of the old days — did that 'spur' the population to do
anything?
Don't you see, John, that if poverty had been the splendid stimulus it
used to
be thought, there wouldn't have been any poverty? Some few exceptional
persons
triumphed in spite of it, but we shall never know the amount of world
loss in
the many who did not. "It
was funny," he continued meditatively, "how we went on believing that
in some mysterious way poverty 'strengthened character,' 'developed
initiative,' 'stimulated industry,' and did all manner of fine things;
and
never turned our eyes on the millions of people who lived and died in
poverty
with weakened characters, no initiative, a slow, enforced and hated
industry.
My word, John, what fools we were!" I was
considering this Government Press he described. "How did you dispose of
the newspapers you had?" "Just
as we disposed of the saloons; drove them out of business by
underselling them
with better goods. The laws against lying helped too." "I
don't see how you can stop people's lying." "We
can't stop their lying in private, except by better social standards;
but we
can stop public lying, and we have. If a paper published a false
statement
anyone could bring a complaint; and the district attorney was obliged
to
prosecute. If a paper pleaded ignorance or misinformation it was let
off with a
fine and a reprimand the first time, a heavy fine the second time, and
confiscation the third time; as being proved by their own admission
incompetent
to tell the truth! If it was shown to be an intentional falsehood they
were put
out of business at once." "That's
all very pretty," I said, "and sounds easy as you tell it; but what
made people so hot about lying? They didn't used to mind it. The more
you tell
me of these things the more puzzled I am as to what altered the minds
of the
people. They certainly had to alter considerably from the kind I
remember, to
even want all these changes, much more to enforce them." Owen
wasn't much of a psychologist, and said so. He insisted that people had
wanted
better things, only they did not know it. "Well
— what made them know it?" I insisted. "Now here's one thing, small
in a way, but showing a very long step in alteration;
people dress comfortably and beautifully; almost all of them. What made
them do
it?" "They
have more money," Owen began, "more leisure and better
education." But I
waved this aside. "That
has nothing to do with it. The people with money and education were
precisely
the ones who wore the most outrageous clothes. And as to leisure — they
spent
their leisure in getting up foolish costumes, apparently." "Women
are more intelligent, you see," he began again; but I dismissed this
also.
"The intelligence of a Lord Chancellor didn't prevent his wearing a wig. How did people break
loose from the force of fashion, I
want to know?" He could
not make this clear, and said he wouldn't try. "You show
me all these material changes," I went on; "and I can see that there
was no real obstacle to them; but the obstacle that lasted
so long was in the people's mind. What moved
that? Then you show me this marvellous new education, as resulting in
new kinds
of people, better people, wiser, freer, stronger, braver; and I can see
that at
work. But how did you come to accept this new education? You needn't
lay it all
to the women, as Nellie does. I knew one or two of the most advanced of
them in
1910, and they had no such world-view as this. They wore foolish
clothes and
had no ideal beyond 'Votes for Women' — some of them. "No
sir I admit that there was potential wealth enough in the earth to
support all
this ease and beauty; and potential energy in the people to produce the
wealth.
I admit that it was possible for people to leave off being stupid and
become
wise — evidently they have done so. But I don't see what made them." "You
go and see Dr. Borderson," said Owen. |